{"id":1209,"date":"2009-10-28T10:53:46","date_gmt":"2009-10-28T17:53:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bspcn.com\/?p=1209"},"modified":"2009-10-28T10:53:46","modified_gmt":"2009-10-28T17:53:46","slug":"8-most-epic-abuses-of-work-email-ever","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/2009\/10\/28\/8-most-epic-abuses-of-work-email-ever\/","title":{"rendered":"8 Most Epic Abuses of Work Email Ever"},"content":{"rendered":"
Written by Julian<\/a><\/p>\n As they say, never email anything you wouldn\u2019t want on the front page of the newspapers. So if you\u2019re considering using your work email to send military secrets, a character assassination or even an erotic proposition, then think again \u2013 the end result could cost you your job, as well as your dignity. These chumps learnt the hard way.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n “Yours was yum\u2026”<\/p>\n When is a compliment not a compliment? Perhaps the following might qualify \u2013 back in 2000 Claire Swire, an employee of a large internet provider, found herself involved with a less than scrupulous lawyer. One day whilst at work he sent her a joke concerning male bodily fluid (yes, that kind). Claire immediately replied:<\/p>\n \u201cI hadn\u2019t swallowed in years but yours was yum and very good for me too! Apparently it\u2019s a very good conditioner for your hair too\u2026getting a funny picture in my head\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n Ego swollen, he impulsively forwarded the reply to all his friends to show off what a stallion he was in the sack. But compliment quickly turned to embarrassment when one of his friends replied stating he felt \u201chonour bound\u201d to forward it on further. Soon the couple became the laughing stock of the office and the internet, although in the end they both managed to escape with their jobs (just).<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Schoolgirls and military secrets don’t mix.<\/p>\n Giving away what you like to get up to in the bedroom is one thing \u2013 but when it comes to emails that shouldn\u2019t have ever been sent, national security is a whole different league. In 2000, schoolgirl Claire McDonald began receiving emails from the Pentagon containing top-secret military information. Her address had been accidentally added to a group list by a navy commander. Even Claire was laughing when, in a cruel twist of irony, one message offered advice on how to prevent secrets from being leaked on the internet. Why bother hacking when the Pentagon can do the work for you?<\/p>\n <\/p>\n ‘Reply to All’ claims another victim.<\/p>\n When school Principal Patrick Hazlewood received a complaint from a local pensioner about his pupils misbehaving, his immediate reaction was to email his colleague with his true feelings: \u201cTell her to get stuffed\u201d. Alas, he hit \u2018Reply to All\u2019 by mistake and his remark found its way to the entire staff address book and parents\u2019 association. The school was later forced to offer an apology.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Racism isn’t funny, even over email.<\/p>\n Early 2006: the phrase \u2018credit crunch\u2019 had not yet made its way into our daily lives, the US housing bubble was in full swing, and Gordon Brown sat licking his lips at the prospect of becoming the next British Prime Minister. What could possibly go wrong? Well aside from the recession\u2026 an email sent by a junior official in the UK entitled \u201cAdvantage of being Chinese\u201d. Not only did the sender expose himself as a racist when he encouraged recipients to \u201ctry pulling the corners of your eyes as if you were Chinese\u201d, but also as a moron when he copied it to his press list, containing 83 national newspaper journalists and columnists. Woops. One chuckling journalist even replied: \u201cWill we be invited to your leaving party?\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n “I can’t believe I was such an ass.”<\/p>\n Sports commentators are no strangers to embarrassing gaffes. In 2002 the BBC radio 5 hired well-known commentators Andy Gray and Jonathan Pearce to help cover the upcoming soccer World Cup in South Korea and Japan. The executive editor of BBC Sports News, Graeme Reid-Davies, decided to email a colleague with his own two-cents, declaring \u201cI think they\u2019re both crap.\u201d Unfortunately, Graeme had not quite mastered the concept of the \u2018Reply to All\u2019 button yet, and before he knew it had sent his comment to over 500 BBC sports staff \u2013 including the new signings, Gray and Pearce. When asked about the incident Graeme did however show he could turn his scathing criticism against himself, stating: \u201cI can\u2019t believe I was such an ass.\u201d<\/p>\n <\/p>\n A little less time posing Bill, and a little more time deleting incriminating emails.<\/p>\n In 1998 Bill Gates showed that even experienced IT professionals are not immune from being caught out by the email. Whilst defending Microsoft against charges brought by the US Justice department, Gates continually denied everything, saying \u2018I don\u2019t recall\u2019 so many times that even the presiding judge had to chuckle. Unfortunately for the software mogul, a thorough examination of his email later confirmed that not only had he been aware of, but had actively participated in attempts to establish an illegal monopoly. Had the man who brought Microsoft Outlook to the masses really thought the police wouldn\u2019t check his inbox? Microsoft were later ordered to share their technology and settled out of court.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Lucy Gao’s email invite was forwarded all over the world.<\/p>\n On her 21st birthday Lucy Gao, a worker for Citigroup in London, organized a bash at the world-famous Ritz Hotel. Little did she know her email invite would go down in internet history as one of the greatest email blunders of all time. Included were instructions on how to deal with door staff, what to wear, what to say, how to look your best and a staggered schedule of guest arrival times. Helpful hints included:<\/p>\n \u201cit goes without saying that the more upper-class you dress, the less likely you shall be denied entry\u201d, and \u201cif you experience any issues\u2026 my PA Ms. Gill will kindly deal with your queries between 8:30pm to 10pm\u201d (believed to be university friend Sanampreet Gill).<\/p>\n Hours later Lucy\u2019s email was doing the rounds of investment banks around the world as she become the subject of global ridicule. Citigroup launched an investigation but later declared that Ms. Gao had done nothing wrong and her employment remained \u201cunaffected\u201d \u2013 unlike her reputation.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n “Old horse fat?” Patrick’s poposition goes down well in the office.<\/p>\n At 9.38 on the 30th July 2003 a high-flying lawyer, Patrick Smith, received an email from a colleague inviting him for drinks later that day. Unfortunately for him, Patrick had evidently been away the day they covered \u2018keep it simple stupid\u2019 at nursery school. Where a simple \u2018yes\u2019 would have sufficed, Patrick chose to reply with the following:<\/p>\n \u201cDude, \u2018Carol\u2019 [not her real name] wants some of that double penetration action, so let me know when you and the old horse fat are around.\u201d<\/p>\n For \u2018old horse fat\u2019 read \u2018penis\u2019 and \u2018double penetration\u2019\u2026 well, you get the idea. Unfortunately for Patrick, it seems he was also away the day they learned how to use email. It\u2019s hard to imagine how he felt when he realized he\u2019d hit \u2018Reply to All\u2019. As one blogger pointed out, his secret remained a secret for all of ten seconds \u2013 just enough time for his colleagues to stop laughing and hit the forward button, and in the end Patrick lost his job, his dignity and any chance of getting laid that night. Hmmm, there\u2019s a lesson to be learned there.<\/p>\n Sources: 1<\/a>, 2<\/a>, 3<\/a><\/p>\n Images by: kosmokomik<\/a>, steve keys<\/a>, Sir Mildred Pierce<\/a>, palgus<\/a>, gameimp<\/a>, wikipedia<\/a>, gawker<\/a>, supervillain<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Written by Julian As they say, never email anything you wouldn\u2019t want on the front page of the newspapers. So if you\u2019re considering using your work email to send military secrets, a character assassination or even an erotic proposition, then think again \u2013 the end result could cost you your job, as well as your […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1209"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1209"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1209\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1210,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1209\/revisions\/1210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1209"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1209"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1209"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}8. \u201cI haven\u2019t swallowed in years.\u201d<\/h2>\n
7. To whom it may (not) concern<\/h2>\n
6. \u201cTell her to get stuffed.\u201d<\/h2>\n
5. Racist or moron\u2026 or racist moron?<\/h2>\n
4. \u201cI think they\u2019re both crap.\u201d<\/h2>\n
3. Note to self: Even Billionaires Should Delete Incriminating Emails<\/h2>\n
2. \u201cThe more upper-class you dress, the less likely you shall be denied entry\u2026\u201d<\/h2>\n
1. \u201cDude, the threesome\u2019s off\u2026 that last email cost me my job.\u201d<\/h2>\n