{"id":2116,"date":"2010-07-08T14:39:48","date_gmt":"2010-07-08T21:39:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.bspcn.com\/?p=2116"},"modified":"2010-07-09T10:54:42","modified_gmt":"2010-07-09T17:54:42","slug":"why-real-id-is-a-really-bad-idea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/2010\/07\/08\/why-real-id-is-a-really-bad-idea\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Real ID is a Really Bad Idea"},"content":{"rendered":"

Written by Ashelia<\/a><\/p>\n

\"Why<\/p>\n

Back in the start of World of Warcraft, <\/em>several years ago, I knew a guy who knew a guy. He was a forum warrior of sorts. He posted inflammatory stuff all day and night. One day, a group of people decided to reign him in and right the wrongs he\u2019d besieged the community with. Long hours spent with search engines occurred and eventually a real life name was found. A few weeks later, a bouquet of roses and a dildo was sent to his door in care of his mother.<\/p>\n

With the tables turned, the forum warrior was discovered to be just a helpless boy. He didn\u2019t have an actual shield or sword like the name forum warrior implied. And his mother wasn\u2019t very happy about the whole situation. The troll became trolled\u2013and the realm of the internet carried over somewhat viciously into the real world.<\/p>\n

Blizzard wrote today that with their new Real ID system, they hope to \u201cconnect the Blizzard community in ways they haven\u2019t been connected before.\u201d They plan on doing this by tying real life names to all forum posts from here on out.<\/p>\n

I, however, posit that the community has been connecting in these ways for years\u2013Blizzard is just naively unaware. And this is a very bad thing.<\/p>\n

I remember when World of Warcraft\u2019s<\/em> mandatory merger with Battle.net was announced nearly a year ago. It was just an e-mail address, a universal login of sorts; it didn\u2019t seem too threatening. There were whispers of big brother, but they sounded dramatic and paranoid. We even got a free in-game vanity pet out of it as a reward\u2013it was hard not to agree with it. It seemed like such an inconsequential thing and the penguin was really cute.<\/p>\n

\"Why<\/p>\n

But I suppose that\u2019s how these things start. Not with a bang, but with a whimper\u2013a gradual step here and there until suddenly you look back to realize everything\u2019s changed. In that case, Blizzard certainly has been busy. Months after release, Battle.net IDs have become Real ID and Real ID has become linked not only as an optional feature in games like World of Warcraft<\/em> or Starcraft 2 <\/em>but to less optional methods of communication, like the official Blizzard forums where Blizzard takes feedback, lets players mingle, and even answers support tickets.<\/p>\n

When Real ID came out a few weeks ago, I threw caution to the wind. Although my name is fairly uncommon, I immediately added everyone in my guild. I did this mostly because I like my guildmates, I trust them, and I\u2019m an officer of our guild; it would be strange for me to not use this service. We killed heroic Lich King together, we make all kinds of obscene jokes, and although I\u2019m one of two females in the entire guild of forty or so people, harassment is never an issue. I\u2019m an equal. I\u2019ve been here for over a year, and as such, giving these players my real life name wasn\u2019t an issue.<\/p>\n

This is a privilege I fully recognize. I haven\u2019t always been that lucky and others definitely aren\u2019t. But even in my privilege, there was a smaller problem. The guildmates I\u2019d friended had friends who could see me as well because of this. For some reason, Real ID came with the feature that everyone can view other people\u2019s friends\u2013that is to say if I friend Joe, I can then see Joe\u2019s friends and Joe\u2019s friends can see me. It seemed wholly unnecessary and it was the first step in the Battle.net merger I would disagree with. The problem is, it wasn\u2019t the last. It was, instead, the start of the proverbial slippery slope.<\/p>\n

As I\u2019ve alluded to, Blizzard announced today that all posts on their forums will be now using Real ID. This is mandatory\u2013if you want to post, you have to post this way. Luckily it isn\u2019t retroactive, but in the distant future for all Blizzard titles, real life names will be next to those who post. This will affect everyone, even Blizzard employees. They are also adding a karma feature that will be a lot like Reddit or Digg.<\/p>\n

This is a horrible idea. Forcing people to sign real life name to a forum post is problematic on a basic level. The internet is largely what it is because of its anonymity\u2013for better and for worse. Many great discussions have been had solely because someone could submit their words without worry of being judged. While it\u2019s unavoidable that some people use anonymity to grief others, they aren\u2019t as large factor on forums as heavily moderated as Blizzard\u2019s. When Blizzard offers that requiring the inclusion of real life names will make gamers more civil and promote polite discussion, I must wonder if they\u2019ve seen most gamers. The ones who played by the rules\u2013who will sign at the dotted x on every forum post\u2013were never the ones who were meant to be civilized. In fact, they are the ones being punished by this new system.<\/p>\n

\"Why<\/p>\n

All Blizzard is effectively doing is giving those who fall between the cracks and margins more fodder to mess with people who do continue to use their services. A lot more fodder. Real life names, addresses, and downright terrifying fodder.<\/p>\n

Additionally, by using a full name, players are tied to their real life persona and unable to separate themselves from their online one. In this system, it becomes linked forever in search engines. This means potential employers could find out if a player was a World of Warcraft<\/em> fan and even the characters they have with a simple search. As cool of a story as it would make to be fired because your boss is staunch Horde and you\u2019re Alliance (or more likely, because you play video games and your employer frowns upon MMORPGs in general), realistically there are aspects of one\u2019s private life that don\u2019t look good during an interview process. My boss doesn\u2019t need to necessarily know if I have three level 80s, or if my arena team is about to get Gladiator using a cheap team composition.<\/p>\n

There\u2019s other issues, too. Women might find it harsher with new avenues of harassment opened. Transgendered people could be inadvertently outted when someone sees Sally, the friendly Paladin chick, posting under the name Steve. Someone could have a distinctive name and be disregarded solely because their name sounded like a person of a certain background, race, religion, or otherwise. And if someone\u2019s a minor\u2013or even major\u2013celebrity, having their name exposed could be damaging. From Felicia Day to Mila Kunis, I doubt they\u2019d like their alternative identity exposed simply because they decided to post a suggestion on the WoW forums or report a bug to support.<\/p>\n

At the time of writing this, I have a friend who works for Blizzard and even she is upset about her name being tied to her video game identity\u2013just a quick Google search with her real life name and you can find her LinkedIn where she mentions her affiliated companies, one of which is Blizzard. She says she simply will stop posting on the forums to avoid any mishaps, but she shouldn\u2019t have to. To some degree, she knows and admits this, but what can she do? It\u2019s her lifeblood. She\u2019s not able to just quit her job because of a bad policy, so instead she\u2019ll just opt out of posting on forums she enjoys.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s largely the point. People shouldn\u2019t have to stop posting or stop using a product because of a larger marketing scheme. This should have never been a decision. There should have been another option; I can think of several off the top of my head. Blizzard could have adopted a Steam-like policy of usernames and then nicknames so users can define exactly how personal they would like their encounter to be. Another solution would have been to use a first name and last initial instead. Or maybe unique ID codes could be linked to real life names, but the code could be shown in the public so people don\u2019t know their real life details.<\/p>\n

And as for the ability to like posts and promote them to the top, maybe I\u2019m negative, but I can see it quickly getting out of hand. Imagine an entire guild down voting your suggestion to a developer for no reason other than your guild is their rival guild or because you used to know them until you had a falling out of sorts. Of course, by even posting your suggestion out there, you\u2019ve just given hundreds of people who may or may not loathe your existence your full name\u2013let alone the trade chat trolls who will find it.<\/p>\n

I mean, you better hope they are mostly all bark and not a lot of bite. And you really better hope they aren\u2019t remotely connected to 4chan or other internet groups. Or at least not good with a phonebook.<\/p>\n

\"Why<\/p>\n

When Blizzard first unveiled the Real ID system, I was excited against my better judgment. It brought my WoW guildmates together. We did things like make fun of each other\u2019s names, put updates that were laughing at inside jokes, and enjoy the novelty of seeing formal names instead of character whispers in-game. But the novelty has since worn off with this announcement and now I\u2019m disappointed. Extremely disappointed, actually.<\/p>\n

Like I said, there were options. Unfortunately it seems Blizzard executives chose not to look into them and then turned a blind eye. It\u2019s just a shame that this lack of foresight will probably at the very least result in the harassment of many thousands of individuals\u2013if it doesn\u2019t end up causing something worse for a select few.<\/p>\n

As for me, I haven\u2019t forgotten about the person from France who spent over six months to track down and attempt murder on a guy who fragged him in Counter-strike<\/em> (NY Daily News<\/em><\/a>). Call me pessimistic all you want, but I have to wonder if Blizzard\u2019s marketing department even thought about it.<\/p>\n

Or if they\u2019ll even listen to us now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Written by Ashelia Back in the start of World of Warcraft, several years ago, I knew a guy who knew a guy. He was a forum warrior of sorts. He posted inflammatory stuff all day and night. One day, a group of people decided to reign him in and right the wrongs he\u2019d besieged the […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2116"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2116"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2116\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2118,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2116\/revisions\/2118"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2116"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2116"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/localhost\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2116"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}